|
Three-Part Alphas
of Active Management
Seven Quantitative Insights into
Active ManagementPart 4
by Ronald N. Kahn
In the previous issue we learned that information ratios, as the
key to active management, depend on both skill and breadth. In
this issue we will learn the constituent parts of alphas, the
fundamental inputs for active management.
Raw signals like analysts' earnings forecasts or broker buy/sell
recommendations hopefully contain information useful in forecasting
returns. But these raw data are not alphas: expected residual
returns. They do not even necessarily have the units of return.
A basic forecasting formula governs the connection between these
raw signals and alphas. This formula refines the raw signals into
alphas by controlling for expectations, skill, and volatility. In
many cases we can simplify this formula to a particularly intuitive
form.
Converting raw signals into alphas
The basic forecasting formula provides the best linear unbiased
estimate of the residual return q,
given the raw signal g:

According to Equation 1, the expectation of
q conditional on g equals
the unconditional expectation of
q, plus a term dependent on the
difference between the observed signal and its unconditional
expectation. Reordering terms, we see that:

So this formula controls for expectations. Only if the raw signal
g differs from its unconditional expectation will the expectation
of q differ from its unconditional
expectation.
This result is intuitive. If company earnings exactly match
expectations, we do not expect the stock to move. That happens
only when earnings do not match expectations.
Now let's simplify Equation 2 into a more intuitive form that
reveals how alphas include controls for skill and volatility. First,
the unconditional expected residual return is zero. In the absence
of information, expected returns match their consensus (CAPM) values.
Second, E{q | g}-E{
q}
is the alpha, the expected residual return given
signal g. Third, the covariance term includes a correlation term
and two standard deviations.
Substituting:

We commonly denote the correlation of raw signals and realizations as
the information coefficient IC, and the standard deviation of the
residual return as w. We will refer to the standardized raw signal
as the score S, because it has mean zero and standard deviation 1.
It ranges roughly from -2 to +2. Hence:

So there are three parts to every alpha: an information coefficient,
a volatility, and a score.
Equation 4 clearly shows how alphas control for skill and volatility.
The information coefficient is a measure of skill. With no skill the
IC is zero, and Equation 4 sets the alpha to zero, as it should. The
greater the skill, the greater the alpha, other things equal.
Volatility serves two purposes in Equation 4. First, it provides the
units of return. The IC and score are dimensionless. Second, it
controls the alpha for volatility. For a given skill level, imagine
two stocks with equal bullish scores of +1. We think both stocks will
go up. Equation 4 says that the higher volatility stock will go up
more. If both Pacific Gas & Electric and Netscape achieve earnings one
standard deviation above expectations, then Netscape should rise more.
Both stocks will rise, but the more volatile stock will rise more.
Providing structure
Understanding the three constituent parts of an alpha can provide
intuition. It can also provide structure in unstructured situations,
where the connections between raw signals and alphas are unclear.
The ultimate example of an unstructured situation is the stock tip.
Even in this case, Equation 4 can provide structure. Imagine that
the stock in question has residual volatility of 20%. Then Table 1
shows the range of possible alphas as a function of IC and score.
Table 1. Analyzing a stock tip.
| |
|
|
Very, |
| |
|
Very |
Very |
| |
|
Positive |
Positive |
| IC |
|
S =
1 |
S =
2 |
|
| Great |
0.10 |
2% |
4% |
| Good |
0.05 |
1% |
2% |
| Average |
0.00 |
0% |
0% |
|
Since stock tips are always presented as very, very positive ("I make
only one or two recommendations a year; you are the first person I
called . . .," etc.), converting from the tip to an alpha only
requires estimating the tipper's IC. Is Warren Buffet on the line,
or someone you have never heard of?
For an institutional money manager, a more relevant example involves
converting broker buy/sell recommendations into alphas. This common
situation has relatively little structure, but understanding three-part
alphas can help.
Table 2 shows an example, assuming that the broker has a good
information coefficient of 0.05.
Table 2. Converting BUY/SELL signals to alphas
| Stock |
w |
Rec. |
Score |
µ |
|
| A |
15% |
BUY |
+1 |
0.75% |
| B |
20% |
BUY |
+1 |
1.00% |
| C |
15% |
SELL |
-1 |
-0.75% |
| D |
30% |
SELL |
-1 |
-1.50% |
| E |
25% |
SELL |
-1 |
-1.25% |
|
Our conversion from recommendations into scores is straightforward.
Notice that Stocks A and B, both recommended, have different alphas.
Stock B has the higher volatility: We expect it to go up more than
Stock A.
Contrast this with simply giving every stock on the buy list an alpha
of 1.0%. In an optimizer, the stocks would all have identical expected
returns, so the optimal portfolio would be the minimum variance
portfolio. The optimal portfolio would load up on the least volatile
stocks. Even after controlling for volatility as in Table 2, an
optimizer still favors low volatility,1 but we have mitigated the
effect.
Summary
In summary, to convert from raw signals to alphas requires controlling
for expectations, skill, and volatility. Understanding this conversion
provides insight and structure in many situations.
Footnotes
1 If we ignore constraints and active return correlations,
optimal active holdings are proportional to the ratio of alpha to active variance.
|